„ICOM-Europe’s New Beginning”
Dr. Hans-Martin Hinz
Chairman of ICOM-Europe
President of ICOM-Germany
Annual conference of the
Network of European Museum Organisations (NEMO)
Berlin, 28 November 2003
Museum für Indische Kunst
Takustraße 40, 14195 Berlin
Dear colleagues from NEMO,
it’s a great delight and an even greater
honour speaking to you about the work of ICOM-Europe
at your annual meeting here in Berlin. One year
ago I have become chairman of this regional ICOM-organisation
and I have been working as president of ICOM-Germany
for five years now.
Surely, all of you are familiar with the structures
of ICOM well enough to understand that there are
118 national committees and 28 international specialised
committees worldwide as well as the Affiliated
International Organisations.
During the last decade, it has been an important
aim to develop regional ICOM-organisations in
order to intensify co-operation between the national
committees of the respective continent. The result
are regional ICOM-groups in Latin America, in
the Asian Pacific region, in the Arabian area,
in some African sub-regions and since ICOM’s
General Conference in Stavanger in 1995, ICOM-Europe
has been established. This foundation was a logical
consequence because approximately 70% of all ICOM-members
are living and working in Europe. However, since
its start, the European regional organisation
had to decide whether it should concentrate its
work on Europe of the European Union or on the
entire European continent.
Unfortunately, ICOM-Europe’s conception
covering the first years has proved as not being
efficient. Therefore, a lively discussion arose
in the Advisory Committee of ICOM last year concerning
the role of ICOM-Europe. This ended last autumn
with the election of the present board. The following
chairpersons belong to ICOM-Europe’s governing
board: France, United Kingdom, Finland, Latvia,
Slovenia, Malta and Germany.
Probably, the chairpersons of the national committees
of the European countries have elected me as chairman
of ICOM-Europe because they have learned about
the profile of ICOM-Germany’s new programme.
It consists mainly of offering the members a straight
international and topical interest variety for
their own events. The themes vary clearly from
those of the International Committees of ICOM
as well as from those of the German national Museum
Association because the majority of the themes
is more concentrated on museums and cultural politics
and, most of all, they are international.
Mainly, the conferences are taking place where
the subject can be discussed on the spot and this
allows a new way of internationalising of museum
work. Therefore, we held our conferences of the
National Committee in the previous years firstly
at the UNESCO in Paris about international culture
politics, then in Brussels about culture policy
of the European Union and its support programmes
of museums. In Warsaw we had a congress concerning
the change of museums after the end of the Cold
War and an other one in Washington this year with
the topic of visitor awareness in museums. This
gave an enormous amount of opportunities to experience
new ways of cooperation among ICOM-partner committees
of the corresponding countries.
Since I don’t want to amplify, only so
much: the events have always brought about a stream
of participants with the result that ICOM-Germany
received many new membership applications as well
as the committee gained more influence on society,
especially when dealing with subjects like the
Code of Ethics and others.
Coming back to ICOM-Europe:
In the future, we would like to emphasise the
following features:
1. The Europe of the European Union
Our members feel a great urge to take into account
the effects of the European Union’s work
on the museums of our continent. The favourite
thought is to have a consultant in Brussels who
could co-ordinate all the information he or she
receives. To me, this is a rather unrealistic
idea because it is too expensive and on the other
hand NEMO has already a consultation mechanism
at its disposal at Brussels. Therefore, I don’t
see any reason why we should have a double-structured
system. In my opinion, a co-operation between
NEMO and ICOM-Europe meets the interests of all
our members. The board of ICOM-Europe would welcome
our participation on the NEMO-consultations in
Brussels by questions and answers of our members
and on the other hand communicate results of the
Brussels talks in the ICOM-family. Perhaps this
situation will help to construct a long-term co-operation.
2. Europe beyond the European Union
With the end of the Cold War came also the end
of the Iron Curtain. The national committees of
ICOM of the border states along the Iron Curtain
have been working for over ten years in tight
co-operations in the regional working group called
Central European ICOM (CEICOM) with the goal of
overcoming their contrasts with great success.
Nevertheless, the division of the continent is
still not over. Especially in the eastern and
southeastern regions of the continent beyond the
new frontiers of the European Union, there is
a great concern in the museum world to be forgotten
by the rest of Europe. Therefore, ICOM-Europe
concentrates its work on East- and Southeast-Europe
in order to bring together committees as well
as colleagues from all those nations. We have
begun this policy in 2003 and have started a workshop
series named ‘Museum work After the End
of Communism’, together with Russian, Belarussian
and German institutions. The first part was a
conference in the Russian city of Tver (north
of Moscow) in April 2003 with a focus on the work
of regional museums. The second part dealt with
‘Identity’ and took place in the Belarussian
capital Minsk in September 2003. The third and
last workshop will be realised in Berlin in April
2004. This workshop series demonstrates clearly
the strong demand of exchange of international
experience.
Many events have been and will be under the auspieces
or patronage of ICOM-Europe. This proved to be
quite helpful because it facilitates the realisation
of the events immensely. For the coming year,
auspieces are planned for an international Baltic
museums workshop and for a German-Luxembourgian
symposium titled ‘Exhibits as Historical
Testimonies’ as well as ‘Intangible
Cultural Heritage’. Further activities for
the years to come are being discussed.
3. ICOM-Europe and the Intercultural Dialogue
Apart from the European activities, we would
like to offer our colleagues the exchange of different
cultural substances - a necessity for ICOM as
a world organisation. As one result, we have already
made first contacts with our neighbour-region
ICOM-Arab and will have first talks with its board
in January 2004 with the goal of developing joint
activities. Our idea is to build a workshop for
Arabian and European colleagues that will deal
with questions of communication and education
concerning museums work. Furthermore, we are planning
joint patronage for Arabian-European projects.
For example, for the planned exhibition ‘Saladin
and the Crusaders’ in Mannheim and Damascus
we will not only take the patronage but we will
as well realise Arabian-European symposiums for
the fringe programme in order to discuss the different
point of views on history and culture.
If ICOM-Europe is successful in intensifying the
international dialogue among our members so that
colleagues from various states get more and better
information about each other and increase the
mutual comprehension, then our task will be fulfilled.
I myself would appreciate future co-work of ICOM-Europe
and NEMO very much. I invite all of you cordially
to stimulate common activities .
Thank you very much indeed
|